Music

Piano Diary (1) Books

Wednesday, August 29th, 2007 -- By ET

I did some research about the books people use to learn piano. For beginners, usually the following are the standard books. Hanon, Thompson, Beyer, and Czerny.

I found Hanon to be unrealistic, as it emphasizes pure hand repetitions. This definitely does not work for me. Subconsciously, I would quickly figure out the pattern and just type the pattern without thinking. And this would make it impossible for me to learn the positions of the notes.

Thompson is for very little kids, so I dont think this is suitable for adults.

Beyer is very interesting, I think it is quite suitable for me. There are 106 pieces, and I can immediately start to play the pieces between 20 to 40. It usually takes about a year for kids to reach the 106th, I believe it will be faster in my case.

Czerny has a few books, there is one called 599, one 849, one 24 left hand, etc. For beginners, 599 is suitable. There are 80 (as I remember) pieces. It starts from very simple pieces, and the first half reaches the same level as Beyer. It takes about two years for kids to finish all 80.

There are many other books, for example, I finished reading Teach Yourself to Play Piano. It includes a lot of discussions about music theory, which is very good for me to catch up. There is another one called How to Learn Music by Ears, and one called How to Play Popular Piano in 10 Easy Lessons. I think there can be many of this kind in the library, I, of course, searched them out on the Internet.

Piano Diary (0)

Wednesday, August 29th, 2007 -- By ET

This is the prelude to a series of my piano diaries. In this series of posts, Ill jot down tips about how I learn piano.

As I said in the last post, I started learning piano after reading serious statistics for sometime. So my approach is very different from traditional ways of learning piano.

First, just comparing my progress with xuanxuans, I realized one thing. The traditional way of practicing piano does not work for adults. I dont have time and the patience to go though the simple repetitions that she uses to get familiar with piano. She can learn for a year just to tap on C D E F, C D E F, E F G -, etc, I really can not.

Second, since my capability of learning is better than hers (she might have a better memory, and maybe better hand-eye coordination), I would like to see how this can help me.

Third, I have experience with guitar, and turned out that this is very helpful.

Overall, while for children we may emphasize practicing, in my case, I would like to win with superior learning methods.

My goals:

I found that for many kids, when they get started, they (and their parents) dont really have a clue about the goal. They just type the keyboard mechanically like, well a machine. Then those who are talented would show, and a few of them may pursue piano as the career. My goal is not to reach grade 10 after 8-10 years of practicing, there is no meaning for me to do that. Im not really in the stage to climb to the acme of the mountain of music. I just want to have some fun with piano, and be able to sing songs, and play simple music like Canon, or Kiss the Rain (Kiss the Rain is not easy, as Jill told me, but compare this with those pieces by List, it is easy). So this method Im using will be significantly different from those used in traditional piano books. I hope after one year, I would be able to reach this goal. Of course, the idea initiated my learning piano sing songs with piano, would be reached far sooner than a year.

Yiruma himself playing

YouTube Preview Image

The sheet, I can not post the sheet here, even I have it, gotta respect the copyright…

YouTube Preview Image

Learning Piano

Wednesday, August 29th, 2007 -- By ET

I started to practice piano on July 10th. The fact that Im spending some time to learn it is not coincidental. A few things can be traced as the root of this newly established interest.

In terms of timing, I have worked very hard for the marketing science conference, and when I came back from Singapore, I spent a whole week working on Bayesian Statistics to prepare for making some progress on that project. Then I felt very tired, as I spent on-average 15 hours a day to read the books/papers and to program. Between then and my two big trips to Beijing/Shanghai and Boston, I have about one week. For this one week, I just want to find something for me to relax. And just about the right time, the piano for xuanxuan has arrived.

In terms of location, there is nothing more convenient to have a piano in your house. :-)

When I was visiting Jill and Gordon in Chicago, we had a lot of fun singing with Gordon playing the guitar. Jill is a good pianist, she started piano when she was young, and, of course, was taught to learn classic music. And Gordon mentioned that it was not hard at all to learn to play the chords on piano and use a guitar fake book to accompany singing. Since we were buying the piano for xuanxuan, I thought maybe I can learn to sing songs on piano.

The first thing I learned on piano is the prelude part of Right Here Waiting. Then I learned the whole thing of Everything I Do, I Do it for You. Its really amazing that these only took me one day to figure out. Of course, I use very crude ways to play them: I play the melody on the right hand, but once I have the chords added on the left hand, they became beautiful music.

Then I had some idea, maybe I should learn to play piano, not so ad hoc as I was doing then, but really learn to play well. This starts my journey of figuring out how to learn piano as fast as possible.

iTunes University @MIT

Saturday, August 25th, 2007 -- By ET

If you have an iPod, and want to keep studying new things, you can actually download MIT lectures and watch them.

Just go to this page. You can find a lot of courses to choose from. This is part of MIT’s opencourseware project.

The following is a screen shot for the course “Differential Equations”.

itunes_mitu.jpg

??

Monday, July 9th, 2007 -- By ET


??????????????599??????????849??????????849?????????299??????????299??????????299?????????????740???????????????????????

?????????,??,?????????,????????????????,???,????,?????.??????,???????????????,?????????599,?24??????718,?????????849,?????????299,??????50??740(699)?.

????19???????????????????,????????????????????,?”????”???,????????,??,??,??????????,??????????????????????.???????????????,???????,????,??????????????.

???????

???????????????????????????,????????,??c???,?????.????????????????????????????,?????????????????????1-5??????c???.

???,????????????????????c??????,??????????????,?3????????,????????????????????????.

?????:?????????.????????????????,?????????????.

???:?????????.

???:?????.?????????????.?????????????????????????,????????????????,?????????????.

???:?????????.??????????,????.

???:?????????.

????:????????????????,?????????????,?????????????????????.

?????????

?,????????????

???????????????????????599??????????????849.

1,????????????599

???????????????????????.?????????.?????57???????????,??????????,??????,??,???????????.?????58~79?.58??70????????,??????????????,???????????????????.71?~79?????????????????.??????,??????,???,????,?????.?????????????????????????,????,??,????????.?????80????,???????,????,???,????????????????,;?????????,????????,????,????.

2,????????????139

???599???849?????.139???????599??,?????599???????.?599?50???????*??.

3,????24?????????718

????????????,?????,???,???,?????,?????????,???????,??????????????,??????.

4,????160??????????821

????????????,???????,????????????????.?????8??,????????,???????????,???????????.

5,?????????37(???”????”)

???50?,????.????????????,??????.????????????????????.

6,??????????25??100,???18??109

??????????????,????,????,??????,?????,?????????.?599?50????,????????100???.??109??????100?,?????.???????849?????.

7,???????????849

?599?849??????????????????.849?30?,??????????????.????????????????,?????”??”??.849?599,139???????????????,??849?????,????????,???????????,???????????.

Hard Drive as Linux Server

Wednesday, May 9th, 2007 -- By ET

maxtor_shared_storage_plus.jpg I bought a Maxtor Shared Storage Plus external hard drive.

The installation is simple, you just connect it to the network, and you can find it when you install the driver.

There is a small CPU inside the box, and it supports simple Web Server, file sharing capabilities. So I was thinking maybe I can get it to do more things, like mysql, php, etc. Then it will be really working as a linux server. Turned out that someone has worked this out at http://openmss.org

OpenMSS is a replacement firmware for the Maxtor Shared Storage. Currently its a modified version of the original firmware which includes:

* The same as the original firmware.
* opt directory pointed to your harddrive for local system files.
* ipkg tool to install your own packages.
* Telnet enabled by default (can easly be disabled and replaced by ssh).

Current experimental packages on ipkg server:

busybox_1.0-8_mipsel.ipk
ctorrent_1.3.4-dnh1-1_mipsel.ipk
dropbear_0.46-4_mipsel.ipk
hddtemp_0.3-beta14_mipsel.ipk
kissd_0.12-1_mipsel.ipk
kissd_0.9-1_mipsel.ipk
lsof_4.75-1_mipsel.ipk
ncftp_3.1.8-1_mipsel.ipk
noip_2.1.1-1_mipsel.ipk
rsync_2.6.6_mipsel.ipk
strace_4.5.11-1_mipsel.ipk
unrar_3.51-1_mipsel.ipk
vsftpd_2.0.3-2_mipsel.ipk

In the discussion forum, there is one how-to to explain how to install MySQL, PHP, HTTP.

Nice Video Ad with Nice Music

Wednesday, May 2nd, 2007 -- By ET

This is what a good ad should do.

Each scene refers to one situation matched to the characteristic of a constellation in the zodiac, a total of 12 of them.

Pisces, the fish (February 19 March 20).

Aries, the ram (March 21 April 19);

Taurus, the bull (April 20 May 20);

Gemini, the twins (May 21 June 21);

Cancer, the crab (June 22 July 22);

Leo, the lion (July 23 August 22);

Virgo, the virgin (August 23 September 22);

Libra, the balance (September 23 October 23);

Scorpius (also Scorpio), the scorpion (October 24 November 21);

Sagittarius, the archer (November 22 December 21);

Capricornus (also Capricorn), the goat (December 22 January 19);

Aquarius, the water bearer (January 20 February 18);

YouTube Preview Image

Did You Know

Tuesday, April 24th, 2007 -- By ET

In my undergrad ismt101 class, I showed a video called “Did You Know”. Many people liked it. It talks about shifts in education, in technology and in our lifes. I came across a chinese version of that, so let me post both here.

English version:

YouTube Preview Image

Chinese version:

YouTube Preview Image

Michael Jackson’s Dance and “Heal the World”

Friday, April 20th, 2007 -- By ET

The young generation may not appreciate Michael Jackson’s music, but when I was young, his music video was the first I have ever got on hold and really liked. (The sample may not be representative for me as by that time in China, all music are the same, and they are meant to praise something). Anyway, it was refreshing to watch the fatastic dance.

YouTube Preview Image

My favorate music of MJ? To me, it was “Heal the World”, I really like the soft melody.

YouTube Preview Image

Web 2.0 Search

Friday, March 9th, 2007 -- By ET

Published on Tuesday 6th of February, 2007 by Online Education Database.
Online search is now a multi-billion dollar industry, with Google alone grossing over $3.5 billion in profits last year. It’s no wonder why so many newcomers are hopping on the search bandwagon, hoping to become the next Google. And those new search engines that may stand the best chance to become the next Google all share one common element the use of Web 2.0 technology that they hope will increase search result relevance.

Here are 25 such engines. Some offer functionality that’s slowly making its way into traditional search engines. Others further the attempt to traverse the invisible Web and index other previously unsearchable research sources.

Mashups and Tagging

Many of the new search engines use the modular functionality of Web 2.0: mash together several services and add new features.

  1. AjaxwhoisAjaxwhois.
    Doing a little domain name research? Ajaxwhois takes an existing protocol, WHOIS, and wraps it with a more responsive one. It’s not a traditional search engine per se, but does make finding domain registration information faster. Start typing, and if you stop, it sends out a query. Add a few more characters to the domain name, and the query starts fresh. Results include links to hosting plans, the site (if it’s registered), and Alexaholic, which is a mashup of Alexa, a Web traffic rankings service.
  2. FlickrStormFlickrStorm.
    FlickrStorm provides a nice mashup for flickr images. Enter a tag and it comes back with square thumbnails. Scroll through the array, click on images, and they’ll be displayed larger. Add the ones you like to your own “tray”, for later download. It’s a simple but effective interface for consuming photos. An “advanced” feature filters images by license types, including Creative Commons.
  3. FundooWebFundooWeb.
    FundooWeb is a multi-mashup, incorporating results from Yahoo!, Flickr, Yahoo! News, Yahoo! Answers, Amazon, and Yahoo! Maps images. If you search all sources, the results are presented in a couple of formats, including collapsible headlines and a Flickr photo strip, partitioned by source. There’s obviously a heavy leaning to Yahoo, but it’s not a bad way to conveniently compartmentalize several search result sets.
  4. KeotagKeotag.
    Keotag‘s initial face looks quite simple, with font sizes large enough for the dead to read. Type in a keyword or phrase and a line of favicons appear for Google, Technorati, and Bloglines, as well as over a dozen social bookmarking and community news sites. At far left is a Technorati chart showing the number of blog posts containing the key phrase over the past 30 days. Clicking on a particular favicon reveals result headlines for that source, which can be subscribed to through the resulting RSS feed.
  5. WhonuWhonu.
    Whonu is arguably one of the very first semantic Web search engines available. It offers over 300 search sources and a smart interface that contextualizes what you enter. For example, enter a US ZIP code and whonu presents a set of links to geocode tools including maps, weather maps, and even public events in Google Calendar. There are so many features that the demo screencast video is 26 minutes long. Information is double partitioned by file type and source. The variety of options might be a bit intimidating, but for power research, whonu looks like one of the most promising search tools available, with an effort made to present structured meaning. Killer feature saved query history using a row of dots.
  6. similicio.usSimilicio.us.
    Similicio.us is mashup of del.icio.us which tries to find sites related to a user-entered URL. In other words, “people who liked this site also liked”. This recommendation engine idea is so basic in functionality that it’s a surprise someone didn’t think of it before. The creator of the site admits that similicio.us currently uses shallow searching on del.icio.us to keep queries to their service at a minimum. This is no doubt an engine that could prove useful in other mashups, were it to be extended in scope. (One possibility is to team up with del.icio.us and have access to their full database and engine.)

Rich Internet Application Search Interfaces

The “rich” in RIAs is a matter of personal definition, but engines in this category offer a little something extra in terms of the interface, sometimes employing AJAX.

  1. HuckabuckHuckabuck.
    On the surface, Huckabuck seems like any other text search engine, but click on the “search tuner” button and a neat little “equalizer” panel reveals itself. You can use it to give more weight to the different sources Google, Yahoo, MSN, Technorati, Digg, del.icio.us – as well color-code results, set the slider for results per page, turn on auto-completion on or off, and more. Click on the Presets arrows to reveal predefined equalizations for Research, Shopping, Blog search, Metasearch, Technology Research, and Social Search. Not a bad start to partitioning search results meaningfully.
  2. KartOOKartoo.
    Kartoo is yet another search engine that partitions results into several categories, some serious, some frivolous. The presentation, however, is quite different, displayed in little clusters using Flash and icons of a sheet of paper for each result. Some results are more relevant than others, and clicking on an icon takes you to a deeper level of results. This paradigm might be a little confusing at first, but hovering your mouse over a result produces a result summary at left, including a screencap of the result page.
  3. KwMapKwMap.
    KwMap touts itself as “a keyword map for the whole Internet”. Type in a keyword or phrase, and an unusual interface appears. At right is an alphabetical list of related keyphrases. At left is a visual component showing two axes that resemble an insect’s antennae, dotted with nodes representing related terms. Clicking on a term’s node takes you to another layer of loosely-related terms. This is a new search paradigm, but it offers the opportunity to explore related concepts in small leaps. Thus, a search for the word “tree” could lead you to “tea tree oil” or to a study of ancestor worship (via “family tree”). Hyperlinking mimicks hyper-thought.
  4. mnemomapMnemomap.
    Mnemomap uses multiple components to display search results. Topmost is a hierarchical graph with nodes branching off the search term. Non-clickable secondary nodes are “Token”, “Tags”, “Translations” and “Synonyms”. Tertiary nodes are search results and can have either a tight relationship to the original search term or a tenuous relationship. Clicking on a tertiary node either adds it to a bar below for a refined search, or produces a new graph, depending on where you click. Below is a section displaying relevant results from Mnemo, Yahoo, flickr, and YouTube. Mnemomap, currently in Alpha 0.2, is a fascinating paradigm for searching, but more suited to power researchers than to the average search engine user.
  5. PreFoundPreFound.
    PreFound, which is powered by Eurekster Swicki, is a simple search engine on the surface, but contains a little slider “equalizer” panel similar to the one in Huckaback (above). PreFound’s panel has settings for music, movies, TV, xBox, etc., instead of search engines. You do have to register to see and use the equalizer (which they oddly call a social search equalizer) but you do not have to ask a question, view previous answers related to your search, or to promote up a search result.
  6. QuinturaQuintura.
    Quintura, who recently received funding, presents text or image search results in a minimalist but graphic form resembling a freeform tag cloud. Holding your mouse cursor long enough over a term in the cloud causes new, related terms to appear in the vicinity of the cursor. While the no click interface is a bit disconcerting at first, you can start over by holding the cursor over the original search term, displayed in red text. Any term in focus (hovered over) generates search results in a scrollable panel below.
  7. UjikoUjiko.
    Ujiko has an interface reminiscent of some sort of a video game, presenting results in both a central circle as well as in rows surrounding the circle. The setup allows you to drill down into the categories in the circle or click on actual results on either side, which can be marked as favorites. Ujiko makes a commendable attempt in presenting meaningful results in digestible bites, with a constantly updated interface.
  8. TagnauticaTagnautica.
    Tagnautica starts off with a minimalist interface: a black background and a “CLICK HERE” message. Click and enter your search term, then wait for the strange revolving circle containing numerous spheres on the circumference, which undulate up and down in size. Talk about organic search results. Each result represents a relate term, which can be drilled down into. Or you can click whatever term is in the center (initially the original search term) to get a page of flickr images. Tagnautica is a fascinating photo search parardigm that’s lots of fun and definitely visually inspiring.
  9. TopixTopix.
    Ever want to search for topical Web pages and wish you could easily narrow the search to a certain time period? Topix offers just that ability with a neat little interactive timeline map. Clicking on a particular day produces results ordered reverse chronologically from that day backwards. Definitely a handy tool for research, and would be killer mashed up with other functionality.

Social Aspects: User Contribution, Recommendation, Social Networks

Social networks are a hot Web application space, and now they creeping into search engines.

  1. ClipfireClipfire.
    Michael Arrington of Techcrunch gave Clipfire his blessing, saying how much he likes this ecommerce deal-finding search engine. Sometimes all you need is a simple interface; it’s the members that matter here. The idea is that members submit Web sites, Clipfire searches them, then presents later searchers with product and service deal info. Members are encouraged to use their own affiliate links so that they’re motivated to find good deals and share them. This is a unique idea that’s unlikely to remain so for much longer.
  2. OmgiliOmgili.
    Omgili is a discussion-based engine. In addition to standard search results, a list of links to members is provided who have answered questions relating to a given search term. You can also ask a question, which another member might answer for you with relevant links. Recommendation engines such as omgili have their value in end applications, possibly those similar to the music recommendation site iLike (not to be confused with shopping engine, like).

Visual Search

Engines in this category allow you to search using images and similarity algorithms.

  1. LikeLike.
    Like is a “visual shopping” engine that starts off with images of products. Click on an image to get an array of related product images. Use the interface to select a focus area of one image to find similar products by shape or color – say similar sunglasses. Like also lets you filter brands and price ranges. It’s one of the more sophisticated ways to do affiliate marketing. Of course, while you don’t have to enter any text at all to surf’n'shop, the option is there as well.
  2. PixsyPixsy.
    Pixsy is a visual search engine for pictures or videos selected from several sources including Buzznet, flickr, iStockphoto, Fotolia, YouTube, and others. Clicking on an image takes you to the source page. For stock photo sites, this might provide copyright and license details. A handy tool for online publishers looking for suitable images to reprint.
  3. RetrievrRetrievr.
    Retrievr is a visual search engine in the truest sense of the term, offering the choice of starting with an image (via URL or uploaded) or a sketch from the user, which can be customized by line thickness and color. Images are then retrieved from flickr. Brilliant concept. The honest truth is that very few of the images in the matrix of results have much resemblance to drawn sketches, but those that do are uncanny. An engine like this is only as good as its algorithms (though it uses brainiac wavelet transforms rather than the traditional neural network algorithms). Still, retrievr is an exciting early- generation advanced search engine offering.
  4. RiyaRiya.
    Riya visual search, who also offer Like, lets you search amongst people, objects, tags, and photos, as well as gives you a portal to Google, Yahoo, MSN, and flickr. You can browse broadly across the results or drill down through a specific photoset. Results can be emailed, embedded into Myspace or Blogger pages, or subscribed to via the dynamic RSS feed.
  5. TiltomoTiltomo.
    Tiltomo is yet another flickr mashup that offers a few search options. Enter a single flickr tag or ask for random images. Once you have an array of images, you can find similar images either by theme or by color/ texture. Tiltomo seems to produce slightly more relevant secondary results than some of the other visual search engines.
  6. XcavatorXcavator.
    Xcavator is another flickr-based engine in its early stages. Currently, it seems a bit limited, as there are only five tags from flickr that can be searched. Selecting one brings up an array of images. Dragging and dropping one of these to the xcavator search box and then selecting a point of interest produces a second, more refined image result set. While these sorts of engines have a ways to go before they’re highly accurate, it’s the promise of what’s to come that’s exciting.

Audio/ Video Search

Up until a few years ago, finding specific music or videos online was a difficult task. Then video search started appearing in traditional search engines. Now, it’s creeping into engines with some advanced features.

  1. LiveplasmaLiveplasma.
    Liveplasma is a music and video search and discovery engine tied to Amazon.com. Enter an artist, band, movie, director, or actor of interest, and up pops an unusual result set paradigm: floating spheres clustered in overlapping orbits. Each sphere represents information related to the search term. Clicking on a result produces an Amazon summary in the left panel, sometimes with CD/ DVD cover art. Clicking on the summary takes you to its Amazon page. Liveplasma is the type of affiilate marketing search engine that can wag the long tail.
  2. VDoogleVdoogle.
    Vdoogle is a video search engine that draws its sources from 14 video sharing sites such as YouTube and DailyMotion, as well as veteran sites such as iFilm. Vdoogle is based on Google’s new roll-your-own custom search engine, which is similar to Rollyo. Its Web 2.0 pedigree is tenuous, though it does mashup other Web 2.0 user-contributed services. The accuracy of Vdoogle relies on the proper tagging of source videos, so the engine could do with its own tagging and recommendation engine as an additional layer.


BlogTimer
You are visitor number several since September 1, 2001

Copyright Xiaoquan (Michael) Zhang, 2004-2010. All rights reserved.
All trademarks property of their owners.